There Is No Avant-garde

by | Jan 10, 2012 | Uncategorized | 8 comments

If I paint ten paintings, I generally keep about 3 or 4. That’s it. Most don’t work out. I think the reason for this is that it is just plain difficult to get into that other dimension where I’m not making pictures but where I just get swept away. There are times when I really do believe that I have forgotten how to paint. So I have to remind myself: don’t paint pictures; let what is before you act as a prompt. Respond. Realize your feelings as you make the marks. Get it through the color. Get beyond the facts. Trust in your creativity. Let go.

 

 

 

Then one day I’m out there painting and I sense that it’s coming back to me. I remember. In fact, I think I’m growing, getting better. It goes on like that. Up and down. Up and down.

I mention this because I think it is worth restating particularly for young artists who feel an inordinate pressure to do something β€œthat is cool,” β€œheavy,” β€œdark,” or β€œchallenging.”  There is something to be said for big, dramatic breakthroughs – the advent of abstraction for example, and/or the subsequent return to figurative painting in the Bay Area Figurative movement where Diebenkorn, Park, Bischoff, Oliveira, Neri and others used big, simplified, almost abstract strokes of color to express who they were. But for the most part, we would do well to drop the term avant-garde and to stop thinking in terms of art movements generally. So much of the β€œit has never been done before” shock-of-the-new during the latter half of the 20th century was contrived, top down, investment driven efforts to turn junk into iconic art products.

Does anyone out there remember Fabian? He was a teen idol who came after Elvis. Well, he didn’t exactly come after Elvis. Because of Elvis, record producers wanted to cash in on the creation of a second Elvis, so they discovered Fabian. I guess you could say he was okay, but like most 20th century art β€œmovements,” he was totally manufactured.

You don’t have to sprout wings and fly about your studio to do something β€œthat has never been done before.” It has never been done before if it is new and refreshing to you.

Many years ago, I went outside to paint for the first time and did two little 8”x10” landscapes. I brought them in to show my teacher, Bill Schultz. He made some supportive comments, suggesting one was more β€œsuccessful” than the other. Then he said, β€œI’m glad to see that you are going outside and starting small. Now, after you do two or three hundred of these, go on to 9”x12.”  I thought he was joking. He wasn’t.

The image at the top is a detail from the image on the left. The people at the cafΓ© were moving about. How was I to paint them? I had no interest in a literal interpretation. I was more interested in loving what I saw simply as visual elements. So if I saw a flash of blue, I made a mark to try and get the color and didn’t care much about anything else. I think it works.

So here’s my point. I don’t care about the need to prove to someone that I’m doing something that has never been done before. When I was much younger I did try to do things in an effort to “break through” into something different only to realize that it was pure crap. So now I’m quite happy to grow painfully slowly. That’s what makes it so challenging.

Monet is said to have painted 15 hours a day in all kinds of weather for many years. He’s always pulling his hair out, destroying dozens of paintings at a time, right up until his death at 86. I like a lot of his early work, but the work that really impresses me wasn’t done until he was in his 70s.

About a year before he died, someone asked him what his message was to young artists. He replied, β€œPainting is very difficult.”  I can live with that.

 

8 Comments

  1. Marion BE

    Lucian Freud changed his style drastically in his sixties, and painted for another 20 years always striving for more. It’s inspiring to know the learning can never cease, there’s always something new, more..

  2. georgia Mansur

    Jerry, thanks for reminding me that ‘new’ is not always better and that painting is almost never ‘easy’. If it were, then where would the challenge be, how could we keep learning and discovering more of the puzzle? I will keep focusing on the process rather than product and just enjoy where that takes me. Its all about the thrill of the discovery. : D
    β€œSit down before fact as a little child, be prepared to give up every conceived notion, follow humbly wherever and whatever abysses nature leads, or you will learn nothing.” β€” Huxley, Thomas

  3. jeff christ

    jerry – i love the way you write – it flows, its easy and relaxed, you express yourself clearly – you have a natural grace about you and your words – thanks for sharing it –

    • Jerry Fresia

      Ah. A true connoisseur!

  4. Mike Daly

    I’m going to Venice for a couple of days in February and I will take your words with me

  5. Sandy

    How fascinating…to see the close up of the activity of the busy street scene…by just adding marks of colour…it works so well…magical. Thank you.

    • Jerry Fresia

      Thank you. I guess I would call it “getting it through the color.” And it doesn’t hurt to treat everything one sees the same way. Plus it is more fun.

  6. Nyx

    Thanks for these encouraging words! I want to get “swept away” more–without even trying. πŸ˜‰

ARCHIVES

Address

Via Teresio Olivelli, 20
22021 Bellagio (CO)
Italy
+39 338 975 7135

Open Hours

Tuesday - Saturday: 11:00am – 6:00pm
Sunday - Monday: 1:00pm – 6:00pm

Follow